SEPTEMBER 2019

Federal Communications Commission

The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has announced a delay in implementation of the reassigned number database which would track when a number has been disconnected and reassigned. Use of that information would allow businesses to “clean” their internal “do-not-call” file as a “do-not-call” request would no longer be effective if the number has been disconnected and reassigned. The FCC ordered pricing to be published in February 2020 with potential activation of the list in December 2020.

Read More

AUGUST 2019

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a fax class action which argued that solicited faxes needed to have opt-out notices.  Gorss Motels, Inc. v. Safemark Systems, LP.

Comment: The Court noted the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) held the solicited fax rule was invalid and was never legally enforceable despite the fact that plaintiffs argued it should be enforced retrospectively.

Read More

JULY 2019

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a trial judge’s ruling that $1.6 billion in damages in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) class action was so oppressive that it violated the due process clause of the United States Constitution.  Golan v. FreeEats.com, Inc.

 Comment: The Court still awarded the plaintiffs $32 million, so defendant still faces potentially catastrophic damages.

Read More

JUNE 2019

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has joined the Fourth Circuit in finding the debt collection exemption to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) to be unconstitutional, and like the Fourth Circuit, it severed the exemption rather than striking the whole TCPA cell phone call ban.  Duguid v. Facebook, Inc.

Comment: We are counsel in the Fourth Circuit case and have appealed arguing that severing the exemption results in less speech, not more speech, which is the goal of the First Amendment.

Read More

MAY 2019

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a notice of proposed rule-making with regard to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act which would limit debt collectors to no more than seven attempts by telephone per week to reach a consumer about a specific debt and require debt collectors to send consumers certain information about the debt including itemization and how to dispute the debt.  Comments are due 90 days after publication in the Federal Register which will happen in the coming weeks and can be submitted using Docket No. CFPB-2019-0022 at www.regulations.gov.

Comment: Please contact me if you would like assistance with filing comments. Frequency restrictions regarding how often a telemarketer or debt collector can contact a consumer are rare, but states and federal agencies are increasingly proposing them.

Read More

APRIL 2019

Federal Trade Commission

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has obtained settlements with two charities after alleging they deceived donors with false claims about their charitable purposes.  FTC v. Disabled Police and Sheriffs Foundation, Inc. and FTC v. American Veterans Foundation, Inc.  The charities and their executive directors are banned from soliciting charitable contributions in the future and from making false claims.

Read More

MARCH 2019

Federal Trade Commission

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has obtained a temporary restraining order against a group of companies which allegedly collected fake debt from consumers which the companies had purchased from Scott Tucker, a payday loan generator recently seen in a Netflix documentary “Dirty Money”.

Comment: When the FTC obtains a temporary restraining order, it is “kicking the doors down” on a business, stopping it from doing business without negotiation or warning.

Read More

FEBRUARY 2019

TCPA

More courts are enforcing arbitration provisions to defeat purported Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) class actions.  In re: Midland Credit Management, Inc. (S.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2019); Petrie v. Gosmith, Inc. (D. Colo. Jan. 31, 2019).

Comment: For the arbitration clauses to apply, the calls or texts must be related to the topic of the agreement, and not some unrelated goods or services.

Read More

JANUARY 2019

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

The Eight Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that an insurer had no obligation to provide coverage to a sender of faxes because of an exclusion in the insurance language for “distribution of material in violation of statutes”.  American Family Insurance Co. v. Vein Centers for Excellence, Inc.

Comment: Most insurance Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) cases have been resolved by similar exclusion language.  Insurers started including TCPA exclusion language after TCPA class actions began to become common.

Read More